From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In United States telecommunication law, the Modification of Final Judgment (MFJ ) is the August 1982 consent decree concerning the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T) and its subsidiaries, in the antitrust lawsuit United States v. AT&T of 1974. The terms required the breakup of the Bell System , including removing local telephone service from AT&T control and placing business restrictions on the divested local telephone companies in exchange for removing other longstanding restrictions on what businesses AT&T could own and manage.[ 1] : 125
The decree replaced the entirety of the previous final judgment of January 24, 1956 in the case United States v. Western Electric Inc. ,[ 2] [ 3] which had been transferred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and is referred to in the MFJ as the Western Electric case,[ 4] : 143 (also footnote 4) and consolidated with the existing United States v. AT&T filed on November 20, 1974, which is referred to in the MFJ as the AT&T action[ 4] : 139 or AT&T case.
The decree was made with Harold H. Greene as presiding judge.[ 4]
^ Noll, A. Michael (2010). Highway of Dreams: A Critical View Along the Information Superhighway (digital printing ed.). New York City: Routledge. ISBN 9781136685033 . LCCN 96041620 .
^ Modification of Final Judgement (archived scan) in United States of America v. Western Electric Company, Incorporated, and American Telephone and Telegraph Company . United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 82-0192, filed August 24, 1982. Retrieved 2019-01-29.
^ Sullivan, Lawrence A.; Hertz, Ellen (September 1990). "The AT&T Antitrust Consent Decree: Should Congress Change the Rules" . Berkeley Technology Law Journal . 5 (2). University of California, Berkeley, School of Law : 236. doi :10.15779/Z38JH3G . ISSN 1086-3818 .
^ a b c "United States v. American Tel. and Tel. Co., 552 F. Supp. 131 (D.D.C. 1983)" . Justia . Retrieved January 29, 2019 . Copy of full opinion accompanying the Modification of Final Judgment.
This article incorporates public domain material from Federal Standard 1037C . General Services Administration . Archived from the original on January 22, 2022.
Statutes and regulations Supreme Court case law
Sherman Antitrust Act case law
United States v. E. C. Knight Co. (1895)
United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Association (1897)
Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United States (1899)
Northern Securities Co. v. United States (1904)
Swift & Co. v. United States (1905)
Loewe v. Lawlor (1908)
Dr. Miles Medical Co. v. John D. Park & Sons Co. (1911)
Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. United States (1911)
United States v. American Tobacco Co. (1911)
United States v. Terminal Railroad Association (1912)
Chicago Board of Trade v. United States (1918)
United States v. Colgate & Co. (1919)
Federal Baseball Club v. National League (1922)
United States v. General Electric Co. (1926)
Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United States (1939)
Ethyl Gasoline Corp. v. United States (1940)
United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co. (1940)
Fashion Originators' Guild of America v. FTC (1941)
United States v. Masonite Corp. (1942)
United States v. Univis Lens Co. (1942)
Parker v. Brown (1943)
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n (1944)
Associated Press v. United States (1945)
Hartford-Empire Co. v. United States (1945)
Bigelow v. RKO Radio Pictures, Inc. (1946)
International Salt Co. v. United States (1947)
United States v. Line Material Co. (1948)
United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc. (1948)
United States v. United States Gypsum Co. (1948–1950)
Besser Manufacturing Co. v. United States (1951)
Lorain Journal Co. v. United States (1951)
United States v. New Wrinkle, Inc. (1952)
Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United States (1953)
Toolson v. New York Yankees, Inc. (1953)
United States v. International Boxing Club of New York, Inc. (1955)
Radovich v. National Football League (1957)
Klor's, Inc. v. Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. (1959)
United States v. Parke, Davis & Co. (1960)
United States v. Loew's Inc. (1962)
United States v. Wise (1962)
Silver v. New York Stock Exchange (1963)
United States v. Singer Mfg. Co. (1963)
Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp. (1965)
Albrecht v. Herald Co. (1968)
Haywood v. National Basketball Association (1971)
Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc. (1971)
Flood v. Kuhn (1972)
Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States (1973)
United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd. (1973)
Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar (1975)
Continental Television, Inc. v. GTE Sylvania, Inc. (1977)
Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois (1977)
Broadcast Music, Inc. v. CBS Inc. (1979)
California Retail Liquor Dealers Ass'n v. Midcal Aluminum, Inc. (1980)
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Inc. v. Hydrolevel Corp. (1982)
Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society (1982)
Rice v. Norman Williams Co. (1982)
Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp. (1984)
Jefferson Parish Hospital District No. 2 v. Hyde (1984)
NCAA v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma (1984)
Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp. (1985)
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. (1985)
Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp. (1986)
Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc. (1992)
Hartford Fire Insurance Co. v. California (1993)
Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. McQuillan (1993)
State Oil Co. v. Khan (1997)
Verizon Communications Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP (2004)
Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. (2006)
Texaco Inc. v. Dagher (2006)
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (2007)
Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. (2007)
Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co. (2007)
Pacific Bell Telephone Co. v. linkLine Communications, Inc. (2009)
American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League (2010)
North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC (2015)
Ohio v. American Express Co. (2018)
National Collegiate Athletic Association v. Alston (2021)
Interstate Commerce Act case lawClayton Antitrust Act case lawFTC Act case lawRobinson–Patman Act case lawOther cases
Other federal case law Ongoing litigation ‡ Related topics ‡ date of filing
Local telephone companies still extant
Wholly owned Partially owned
Other subsidiaries
Manufacturing Research Long distance Wireless Regional Bell companies